|
ARE
DONOR LUNG CRITERIA
TOO RESTRICTIVE?
SAN
FRANCISCOA
recent analysis of donor lungs rejected for use in transplantation
has shown that many of them were potentially usable.[1]
Currently, more than 85% of lungs are rejected. Although
many patients die while waiting for donor lungs, the criteria
used to assess suitability have not been prospectively evaluated,
and few studies have examined the condition of rejected
lungs.
To address
this, Lorraine B. Ware, MD, and colleagues at the University
of California, San Francisco, obtained 29 pairs of donor
lungs that were rejected by the California Transplant Donor
Network. The investigators criteria for lung suitability
were as follows[1]:
Absent or mild pulmonary edema.
Normal alveolar fluid clearance.
No significant microbial growth on culture.
Normal or mildly abnormal histological findings.
No nonpulmonary donor factors that would be cause
for rejection.
Published
criteria include factors such as donor age, smoking history,
chest radiograph findings, oxygenation, evidence of infection,
and history of aspiration, trauma, or lung disease,
said Dr. Ware, now an Assistant Professor of Allergy, Pulmonary,
and Critical Care Medicine at Vanderbilt University in Nashville,
Tennessee. Our criteria for deciding if a lung [was]
suitable for transplantation were based on a laboratory
evaluation of the lungs, not on a clinical evaluation of
the donor.
USABLE
LUNGS IDENTIFIED
Using
the studys criteria, 12 of 29 pairs of rejected lungs
were found to be usable for transplantation. Most had no
or mild pulmonary edema, and all had measurable alveolar
fluid clearance. An oxygen tension (PO2)
of 300 mm Hg or more was associated with a lower mean water-to-dry-weight
ratio and faster alveolar fluid clearance.
A normal
chest film also correlated with faster alveolar clearance,
but did not predict the degree of pulmonary edema. Although
chest films are a standard part of the evaluation for lung
transplant suitability, the researchers found they were
not as useful as PO2 and could not
be used to predict the presence of histologic abnormalities.
Histology
revealed organisms in seven and neutrophils in 19 donor
lungs. The presence of neutrophils was associated with bronchopneumonia.
Tissue cultures were positive for bacteria in 13 lungs and
Candida sp. in six. All cultures had a low colony
count and many organisms were nonpathogenic.
According
to Dr. Ware, the results were somewhat unexpected. While
we predicted that some lungs would appear suitable for transplantation,
we did not think that this number would approach half of
the lungs, she admitted.
PRESENT
CRITERIA NEED EVALUATING
Dr. Ware
said that although published guidelines exist, many organ
procurement organizations, centers, and individual surgeons
modify the criteria somewhat. She noted that the overall
rate of donor lung utilization in the United States hovers
around 15% and is not improving.
If more
usable lungs could be identified, the rate of donor utilization
would more than double. The criteria for selecting
donor lungs need to be scientifically and prospectively
evaluated in a multicenter trial to determine how [they]
can be broadened without increasing risk to lung recipients,
Dr. Ware commented.
Gale
Jurasek
Reference
1. Ware LB, Wang Y, Fang X, et al. Assessment of lungs rejected
for transplantation and implications for donor selection.
Lancet. 2002;360:619-620.
Return
to table of contents
|