|
     
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW
EVIDENCE- BASED REPORT
TACKLES ACUTE COPD
SAN FRANCISCOAfter
two years of reviewing the medical literature, a panel of experts from the American
College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the American College of PhysiciansAmerican
Society of Internal Medicine has produced a clinical practice guideline on the
management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).[1]
The guideline was based on a comprehensive evidence-based report that was sponsored
by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
The panel based its conclusions
on several decades of available data. Although much of the information gathered
was strong, it was not always the best type of data available. There are
virtually no controlled trials of outpatients with [COPD] exacerbations,
said panel member Peter Bach, MD. That is unfortunate because most of these exacerbations
occur outside the hospital, said Dr. Bach, an assistant attending physician in
the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center in New York City. He and fellow panel member Douglas C. McCrory,
MD, previewed the report at the annual meeting of the ACCP.
The panel obtained the bulk of
its data through MEDLINE and EMBASE searches, as well as by a review of the Cochrane
Controlled Trials Register. Only data from randomized and other prospective controlled
trials were included in evaluations of acute COPD treatments. For questions about
diagnosis and prognosis, the panel also used data from retrospective and prospective
cohort studies and case series.
ASSESSMENT AND
PROGNOSIS
Practitioners often use a
severity scale that divides COPD exacerbations into three categories, the panel
reported. These categories include:
Type 1: Increased dyspnea,
sputum volume, and sputum purulence.
Type 2: Two of the
three type-1 symptoms.
Type 3: One type-1
symptom and at least one of the following: upper respiratory infection within
the past five days, fever with no other cause, increased wheezing or cough, or
a 20% rise over baseline in respiratory or heart rate.
While the scales validity
is limitedbased only on response to antibiotic treatmentit is
the best scale out there, said Dr. McCrory, an Assistant Professor in the
Evidence-Based Practice Center at Duke University School of Medicine in Durham,
North Carolina, which developed the report for AHRQ.
Admission chest films are
useful in acute COPD because they often precipitate a change in management, the
panel found. However, there was insufficient evidence to permit firm conclusions
about the best way to detect deep vein thrombosis, which frequently accompanies
COPD exacerbations.
Due to the poor correlation
between forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and arterial blood gases
(ABGs), spirometry should play only a limited role in assessing acute COPD. Clinically,
this poor correlation
means that the spirometric measure cannot obviate
the need for ABG measurement in patients presenting with acute exacerbation of
COPD, the panel explained in the report.
Although advanced age and
intravenous fluid administration, among other factors, have been linked to a worsening
of COPD exacerbations, no predictive model accurately forecasts patient outcomes,
such as hospitalization, relapse, the need for mechanical ventilation, or mortality.
Therefore, emphasized the panel, ongoing clinical monitoring often is necessary
in patients with acute COPD.
TREATING EXACERBATIONS
A small improvement in these
patients pulmonary function occurs with antibiotic treatment; the drugs
studied included tetracycline, doxycycline, chloramphenicol, ampicillin, amoxicillin,
co-trimoxazole, and a penicillin-streptomycin combination. Antibiotics seem to
be most beneficial in those with evidence of bacterial infection (eg, sputum purulence)
or more severe illness (as indicated by peak expiratory flow). This has not been
conclusively proved, however.
Narrow-spectrum antibiotics
appear to be reasonable first-line agents for acute COPD; existing randomized,
controlled trials have not established the superiority of the newer broad-spectrum
antibiotics. However, these studies are old, making them difficult to interpret
in a world where we now have many resistant organisms, Dr. Bach cautioned.
Bronchodilators are also effective
for COPD exacerbations; however, the panel found no difference in effectiveness
between ß2-agonists and anticholinergics. Further,
adding one of these drugs after achieving maximum bronchodilation with the other
did not appear to produce an incremental increase in efficacy. Methylxanthines
were found to be less effective bronchodilators than either of the other two drug
classes, and they were associated with a higher rate of adverse reactions.
For patients who need hospitalization
for COPD exacerbations, two weeks of systemic corticosteroids is preferable to
eight weeks, several good trials have suggested. The most well known of these
trials is the Systemic Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Exacerbations (SCCOPE) Trial, which found similar FEV1 improvements and decreases
in treatment-failure risk among acute COPD inpatients randomized to two or eight
weeks of systemic methylprednisolone.[2]
Adverse side effects were
less common with the shorter regimen, the trial also showed. However, the optimal
dose and duration of systemic corticosteroids for acute COPD remains unclear,
the panel noted. Further, inhaled corticosteroids have not been adequately tested
in patients with this condition.
Though laborious, noninvasive
positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is sometimes an effective alternative to
mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure secondary to
a COPD exacerbation. For best results, patients must be conscious and able to
tolerate the use of the NPPV apparatus. However, those with rapidly deteriorating
respiratory status, as indicated by a pH below 7.3, are candidates for immediate
intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Typically, NPPV is better
tolerated and thus more effective if patients get the type of mask (nasal or face)
that maximizes their comfort. The same applies to the ventilator mode. Pressure
support ventilation and continuous or bi-level positive airway pressure modes
appear to be best tolerated. Generally, the assist-control mode with NPPV is poorly
tolerated unless the volume and rate are adjusted to the individual patient.
Three common acute COPD therapiesmucolytics,
chest physiotherapy, and methylxanthinesare probably not recommended, said
Dr. Bach, because they seem to lack benefit and may even be harmful. Furthermore,
mucolytics do not change symptom duration or severity.
--Timothy
Begany
References
1. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 19: Evidence Report on Management
of Acute Exacerbations of COPD. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, US Dept of Health and Human Services; in press. AHRQ publication
00-R050.
2. Erbland ML, Deupree RH, Niewoehner DE. Systemic Corticosteroids in Chronic
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations (SCCOPE): rationale and design of
an equivalence trial. Veterans Administration Cooperative Trials SCCOPE Study
Group. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:404-417.
|
A summary of Management of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary
Disease can be accessed on the Internet at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/copdsum.htm.
The full report was released April 3, 2001 and will be available online at
http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcix.htm, or through the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse,
P.O. Box 8547, Silver Spring, MD 20907, (800) 358-9295.
|
Return
to table of contents
|
|
|
|